Religiosity try seen to be the strongest predictor off intimate bias in our analyses

Ergo, i limited all of our analyses to participants’ perceptions into homosexual some body, instead of particular thoughts reviews ranging from gay people

Really Puerto Ricans follow particular translation of your Religious society. Provided Christianity’s posture for the homosexuality just like the a sinful lives, that isn’t surprising to acquire a strong negative organization ranging from religiosity and you may sexual bias (Diaz, 1998; Service provider, 1995). Moreover, we expected whether religiosity you will definitely boost sexual prejudice because of the broadening participants’ ethical opposition to engage which have homosexual some body and you can/otherwise perceive one connections having homosexual folks once the positive. Nevertheless, an architectural model which have religiosity forecasting sexual bias alongside the most other study parameters are discovered to be unreliable and you may volatile. Thus, we do not believe religiosity ‘s the driving basis for everyone most other data details. While you are an intervention to decrease individuals’ religiosity is shady, we create recommend unlock talks off Christianity’s posture towards intimate direction as opposed to gay behaviors inside religious settings (Bet, Serafini, Rabkin, Remien, & Williams, 1994). These things will get beat Puerto Rican’s negative thinking for the homosexual people and you can females by detatching the main focus of stigma about gay individual in order to a certain sexual conclusion.

Ultimately, i receive zero intercourse variations in the brand new connections between intimate bias in addition to investigation details. Nonetheless, the absence of sex huge difference is on account of our dimension of intimate prejudice. The differences when you look at the item posts in our ATL and you can ATG subscales create right reviews among them subscales unfeasible. Earlier degree searching for intercourse differences in attitudes toward homosexuality adapted this new ATLG items text become the same with the exception of the new reference group (we.e., “[Male/Female] homosexuality try a beneficial perversion.”) (Herek, 2002a). Alternatively, possibly the variations in intimate bias in regards to our data people try perhaps not on account of a gender dichotomy however, in order to differences all over sex jobs (Sakalli, 2002). Men which have greater salience when you look at the machismo and also in their perceptions of masculinity is promote higher sexual bias one of guys (Cunningham, 1998). Future research should explore just how item text, social beliefs, and you can gender distinctions ong Puerto Ricans.

Still, reviews ranging from the design as well as the alternative model advise that religiosity, positive feel that have gay somebody, and you may quantity of interactions that have gay males and you will lesbian predicted sexual bias better than the newest approach causal station

All of our investigation has aisle app several constraints. Basic, this new study’s get across-sectional analysis limited the organization temporary ordering of your parameters. Coming browse is always to mention this new causal relationship amongst the studies parameters. Next, monetary and you will money restrictions reduced the ability to assemble a larger attempt. A more impressive sample that can easily be split inside the arbitrary halves may accommodate most improvement become made on a single half the brand new try, when you are testing the latest completely-altered design on the almost every other arbitrary 50 % of. 3rd, research findings are non-generalizable for Puerto Rican low-school communities. Even when professionals featured encouraged to participate in the research, early in the day browse discover those with reasonable academic attainment tend to score higher on the intimate bias (Herek, 2002). Last, i failed to find out in the event that players interacted with gay people otherwise lesbians exactly who care about-disclosed its sexual direction or if they assumed some men and you may women have been homosexuals. Fifth, our very own failure to evaluate exactly how many students absent contained in this per class during the questionnaire limitations the brand new investigations from prospective visibility biases. Nonetheless, as studies range took place early in new session, we feel the likelihood of dropouts and you will students perhaps not attending lecture have reduced. Fundamentally, religiosity’s influence on sexual prejudice is really worth higher exploration. Our study is incapable of gather information regarding participants’ spiritual affiliations. Because of the variety away from Religious life (85% Roman Catholic and you may fifteen% Protestant or other; CIA Globe Factbook (2005)), coming training will be talk about whether religiosity’s influence on sexual prejudice varies of the religious lifestyle.

0 réponses

Laisser un commentaire

Rejoindre la discussion?
N'hésitez pas à contribuer !

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *